BiomElix One: The Approved Commercial Animal Feed That Generates Genetically Modified Bacteria Inside the Farm Animals Eating It 

A self-repli­cat­ing chro­mo­some cut­ting sys­tem, approved by one export­ing coun­try, poten­tial­ly decid­ing expo­sure for cit­i­zens in import­ing coun­tries. 

Key Facts

Bio­mElix One is a liv­ing, self-repli­cat­ing prod­uct. It’s a chick­en feed addi­tive made of live, genet­i­cal­ly engi­neered bac­te­ria, fed to chick­ens (approved for use only in Brazil) to reduce Sal­mo­nel­la con­t­a­m­i­na­tion.

It works by trans­fer­ring engi­neered DNA far beyond its tar­get Sal­mo­nel­la species. The trans­fer isn’t tar­get­ed to a sin­gle bac­te­r­i­al species — it hap­pens through direct con­tact and pass­es into any sus­cep­ti­ble bac­te­ria, not just its intend­ed tar­get species.

Cre­at­ing new genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied bac­te­ria in the gut is the mech­a­nism, not a side effect. Every trans­fer cre­ates, by def­i­n­i­tion, a new genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied organ­ism. Unlike a sin­gle, con­trolled event in a lab­o­ra­to­ry, this hap­pens mil­lions of times, in an uncon­trolled man­ner, inside ani­mal guts.

Bio­mElix One gen­er­ates liv­ing mod­i­fied bac­te­ria inside ani­mal guts — and those organ­isms could poten­tial­ly remain in chick­en meat for sale. Because genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied bac­te­ria are liv­ing, self-repli­cat­ing organ­isms, any import­ing coun­try that choos­es not to car­ry out its own reg­u­la­to­ry risk assess­ment can end up expos­ing its own cit­i­zens — qui­et­ly bypass­ing any rel­e­vant reg­u­la­tions it may have.

What is the issue? 

Sal­mo­nel­la is a bac­te­ria well known for caus­ing food poi­son­ing in humans, but it also slows the growth of birds in com­mer­cial chick­en farms. In response to the growth issue, two approach­es to Sal­mo­nel­la con­trol have emerged: the first improves the con­di­tions in which chick­ens are raised and has been the suc­cess­ful basis of EU pol­i­cy since 2003[1]. The sec­ond uses anti-Sal­mo­nel­la feed sup­ple­ments and is par­tic­u­lar­ly preva­lent in the high­ly inten­sive farm­ing sys­tems of the Amer­i­c­as. Bio­mElix One is a first-of-its-kind feed addi­tive that is an exam­ple of the lat­ter approach. It works by load­ing into bac­te­ria CRISPR gene-cut­ting instruc­tions that are locat­ed on cir­cu­lar bits of repli­cat­ing DNA called plas­mids. These plas­mids are then active­ly spread through the bac­te­r­i­al com­mu­ni­ties nat­u­ral­ly liv­ing in chick­en’s guts — pass­ing them from bac­te­r­i­al cell to cell, across the many dif­fer­ent bac­te­r­i­al species liv­ing there[3]. Where these engi­neered plas­mids enter Sal­mo­nel­la bac­te­ria, they cut their chro­mo­so­mal DNA and kill it. In every oth­er species the plas­mid trans­fers to, the same intro­duced DNA cut­ting mech­a­nism remains active, but it is not expect­ed to be effec­tive in actu­al­ly cut­ting chro­mo­somes — how­ev­er, each plas­mid trans­fer itself still cre­ates a new, liv­ing genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied organ­ism.

Cross-species spread as an intended design feature

This spread across species isn’t a side effect. It’s how the prod­uct is designed to work: to reach Sal­mo­nel­la, the instruc­tions must pass into many, or even most, of the bac­te­r­i­al species in the gut. So, pro­duc­ing large num­bers of dif­fer­ent genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied bac­te­ria, across many species, is core to the mech­a­nism by which this prod­uct is intend­ed to work. Bio­mElix One is built from genet­ic ele­ments known to work between bac­te­ria that are sep­a­rat­ed by many hun­dreds of mil­lions of years of evo­lu­tion­ary dis­tance.

Key safety data not made public

Once the engi­neered plas­mid is estab­lished in the gut bac­te­r­i­al com­mu­ni­ty, it will not remain inside the bird, but will dis­perse into the envi­ron­ment through drop­pings and poten­tial­ly slaugh­ter waste (see Fig­ure). Fur­ther­more, raw poul­try meat is doc­u­ment­ed to car­ry live bac­te­ria through to the point of sale [4] — though remark­ably, nobody appears to have pub­licly test­ed whether any of those bac­te­ria would car­ry the plas­mid released by Bio­mElix One. It should be not­ed that most key safe­ty prop­er­ties of Bio­mElix One are not pub­lic due to reg­u­la­to­ry doc­u­ments being treat­ed as con­fi­den­tial busi­ness infor­ma­tion, this is despite its com­mer­cial approval. [5]

How Bio­mElix One gen­er­ates new, liv­ing, genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied bac­te­ria in chick­en guts. Chick­ens drink water with the deliv­ery bac­te­ria that con­tain the engi­neered plas­mids (green cir­cles). Inside the gut, the deliv­ery bac­te­ria con­tin­ue to make copies and trans­fer the plas­mid to many bac­te­r­i­al species[3] — most sim­ply retain the plas­mid (non-tar­get species) — while a small pro­por­tion are killed (the tar­get Sal­mo­nel­la species, shown burst­ing). Bac­te­ria car­ry­ing engi­neered plas­mids become dis­persed into the envi­ron­ment through the chick­en’s drop­pings, and oth­er routes. 

Why does this matter? 

A double standard: approved for the environment, barred from the clinic

Sci­en­tists have had a name for what Bio­mElix One does long before it exist­ed as a com­mer­cial prod­uct: broad-spec­trum hor­i­zon­tal gene trans­fer [6]. In 2018, the Nation­al Acad­e­mies of Sci­ences, Engi­neer­ing, and Med­i­cine — in an assess­ment com­mis­sioned by the U.S. Depart­ment of Defense — rat­ed the dif­fi­cul­ty of detect­ing or stop­ping this kind of inter­ven­tion, once released, as medi­um-high risk: one of the most seri­ous rat­ings the report gives to any poten­tial haz­ard it assessed. [7] Yet with­in six years, this same cat­e­go­ry of tech­nique had been approved for com­mer­cial use in ani­mals raised for human food in one major meat-export­ing coun­try — while, at the same time, no coun­try on Earth has approved it even for use in con­trolled clin­i­cal tri­als in humans, despite obvi­ous poten­tial appli­ca­tions (see Box). [8]

What might the consequences be? 

When one country’s approval decides risk for others

Coun­tries usu­al­ly pro­tect their own cit­i­zens by set­ting their own rules — inspect­ing imports and if nec­es­sary declin­ing prod­ucts *.

This kind of over­sight, in the­o­ry, can work well for chem­i­cals or parts of crop plants, but works less well for liv­ing, self-repli­cat­ing organ­isms (or self-repli­cat­ing mod­i­fied plas­mids) that can poten­tial­ly per­sist in trad­ed prod­ucts or in the wider envi­ron­ment. With microbes, export­ing coun­tries with the high­est tol­er­ance for risk or the weak­est over­sight can decide for all those coun­tries that import poten­tial­ly con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed prod­ucts. This is a con­cern­ing and large­ly new kind of loop­hole, spe­cif­ic to liv­ing genet­i­cal­ly mod­i­fied microbes — because an approval in one coun­try can ulti­mate­ly put such prod­ucts on the plates of peo­ple in anoth­er coun­try if their gov­ern­ment choos­es not to prop­er­ly apply its own reg­u­la­tions.

*  From Sep­tem­ber 3, 2026, Brazil­ian meat — includ­ing chick­en — has been barred from enter­ing the EU, under a mea­sure tar­get­ing com­pli­ance with EU rules restrict­ing antimi­cro­bial (antibi­ot­ic) use in food-pro­duc­ing ani­mals.[9] Antibi­ot­ic-resis­tance genes are com­mon­ly car­ried on the same broad-host-range plas­mids exploit­ed in Bio­mElix One

Key References

1.  Euro­pean Par­lia­ment and Coun­cil, Reg­u­la­tion (EC) No 2160/2003 of 17 Novem­ber 2003 on the con­trol of sal­mo­nel­la and oth­er spec­i­fied food-borne zoonot­ic agents. 

2.  Foli­um Sci­ence, a UK com­pa­ny, devel­oped and man­u­fac­tured Bio­mElix One as part of what it termed its “Guid­ed Biotics®” plat­form. On 25 August 2026, US com­pa­ny Bio­mEd­it announced it had acquired Foli­um Sci­ence’s tech­nol­o­gy plat­form and pipeline assets, explic­it­ly high­light­ing Bio­mElix One’s exist­ing reg­u­la­to­ry access to the Brazil­ian mar­ket as part of the deal’s val­ue (https://biomedit.com/biomedit-acquires-folium-science-technology-and-pipeline-assets-to-expand-programmable-veterinary-biologics-capabilities/). Bio­mEd­it’s own lead prod­uct uses a dif­fer­ent mech­a­nism: it engi­neers gut bac­te­ria (Lac­to­bacil­lus reuteri) to express lla­ma-derived anti­bod­ies (“nanobod­ies”) that neu­tral­ize tox­ins from a chick­en pathogen (Clostrid­i­um per­frin­gens) — an approach that, unlike Bio­mElix One, does not involve engi­neered genes trans­fer­ring between bac­te­r­i­al species. A May 2026 cached ver­sion of the foliumscience.com web­site giv­ing some prod­uct details is avail­able from http://web.archive.org/web/20250825073906/https:/foliumscience.com/ 

3.  Con­ju­ga­tion is a nat­ur­al process by which bac­te­ria trans­fer DNA — typ­i­cal­ly a plas­mid — direct­ly from one cell to anoth­er through phys­i­cal con­tact via a struc­ture called a pilus. It is one of three known routes of hor­i­zon­tal gene trans­fer (along­side trans­for­ma­tion and trans­duc­tion) and does not require donor and recip­i­ent to be close­ly relat­ed; broad-host-range plas­mids like those used in Bio­mElix One are specif­i­cal­ly capa­ble of trans­fer­ring between very dis­tant­ly relat­ed bac­te­r­i­al species. 

4.  Euro­pean Food Safe­ty Author­i­ty & Euro­pean Cen­tre for Dis­ease Pre­ven­tion and Con­trol (2025), The Euro­pean Union One Health 2024 Zoonoses Report, EFSA Jour­nal. 

5.  CTNBio Tech­ni­cal Opin­ion No. 7098/2020 — the offi­cial Brazil­ian reg­u­la­to­ry dossier describ­ing Bio­mElix’s mech­a­nism, com­po­si­tion, and approval basis. 

6.  “Hor­i­zon­tal” means between unre­lat­ed organ­isms — com­mon­ly in bac­te­ria between very dis­tant­ly relat­ed species; “ver­ti­cal” means passed down from par­ent to daugh­ter cells. 

7.  Nation­al Acad­e­mies of Sci­ences, Engi­neer­ing, and Med­i­cine (2018), Biode­fense in the Age of Syn­thet­ic Biol­o­gy, Wash­ing­ton, DC: The Nation­al Acad­e­mies Press. Note this is pri­mar­i­ly a biose­cu­ri­ty report and not focused on con­sumer biosafe­ty. 

8.  Stan­dard human clin­i­cal tri­al pro­to­col requires informed con­sent from par­tic­i­pants and built-in mech­a­nisms to pause or stop the tri­al if adverse effects appear. One com­pa­ny pur­su­ing a com­pa­ra­ble approach has so far been unable to obtain per­mis­sion to con­duct such tri­als: https://www.sniprbiome.com/our-approach-and-technology 

9.  Euro­pean Com­mis­sion, Com­mis­sion Imple­ment­ing Reg­u­la­tion (EU) 2026/1189 (5 June 2026), remov­ing Brazil from the list of third coun­tries autho­rised to export ani­mal prod­ucts under Reg­u­la­tion (EU) 2021/405, effec­tive 3 Sep­tem­ber 2026. 

10.  For sev­er­al of these species, liv­ing inside host cells is not inci­den­tal — it is the mech­a­nism by which they cause dis­ease, let­ting the bac­te­ria evade the immune defences that tar­get organ­isms liv­ing out­side cells. 

11.  Wood­ward et al., US Patent Appli­ca­tion 2022/0226396 A1, “Antibac­te­r­i­al Agents & Meth­ods” (Foli­um Sci­ence) — the patent under­ly­ing the tech­nol­o­gy, includ­ing Table 5’s list of car­ri­er and tar­get bac­te­r­i­al species. 

12.  Sal­mo­nel­la, Lis­te­ria, and Yersinia (specif­i­cal­ly Y. ente­ro­co­l­it­i­ca) are doc­u­ment­ed in chick­en gut micro­bio­me stud­ies. Mycobac­teri­um is also poul­try-asso­ci­at­ed (avian mycobac­te­rio­sis, M. avi­um) — though a dif­fer­ent species from the M. bovis/M. tuber­cu­lo­sis named in the patent. Neis­se­ria is not doc­u­ment­ed as present in bird guts. 

13.  Filu­tow­icz, M. et al. (2008), “Bac­te­r­i­al con­ju­ga­tion-based antimi­cro­bial agents,” Plas­mid, 60(1), pp. 38–44. 

14.  The CRISPR/Cas3 sys­tem car­ried by Bio­mElix One’s plas­mid is pro­grammed with three sep­a­rate guide sequences, each tar­get­ing a dif­fer­ent, high­ly con­served site with­in Sal­mo­nel­la-spe­cif­ic path­o­genic­i­ty islands — genom­ic regions cen­tral to Sal­mo­nel­la’s abil­i­ty to cause dis­ease. 

15.  CRISPR/Cas is a gene-edit­ing tech­nol­o­gy adapt­ed from a nat­u­ral­ly occur­ring bac­te­r­i­al immune sys­tem. It uses a short guide sequence to direct a cut­ting enzyme — in Bio­mElix One’s case, Cas3 — to a match­ing site in a tar­get DNA sequence, where it cuts the DNA. First devel­oped as a research tool in the ear­ly 2010s, it is now used across biotech­nol­o­gy to edit, dis­able, or, as here, destroy spe­cif­ic DNA sequences. The CRISPR/Cas3 guide sequences are designed to match DNA unique to the Sal­mo­nel­la genome; they are not intend­ed to cut human DNA. 

to top