UN body considers risky new gene technologies: Civil society urges precaution

Nairo­bi, Kenya, 17 May 2024 — At the 26th meet­ing of the Sub­sidiary Body on Sci­en­tif­ic, Tech­ni­cal and Tech­no­log­i­cal Advice (SBSTTA) Par­ties, Par­ties to the Unit­ed Nations Con­ven­tion on Bio­log­i­cal Diver­si­ty (CBD) are dis­cussing con­tro­ver­sial tech­nolo­gies. One such tech­nol­o­gy is engi­neered gene dri­ves, a form of extreme genet­ic engi­neer­ing designed to spread its mod­i­fi­ca­tion through­out an entire species and per­sist in the envi­ron­ment. In Africa, gene dri­ve projects, large­ly fund­ed by the Bill and Melin­da Gates Foun­da­tion, are already under­way in sev­er­al coun­tries includ­ing Burk­i­na Faso, Ghana, Ugan­da and most recent­ly in Tan­za­nia, aim­ing to erad­i­cate malar­ia. How­ev­er, these tech­no-fix­es do not address the root caus­es of health chal­lenges on the con­ti­nent and pose nov­el risks. Fur­ther­more, these projects are pro­ceed­ing despite the absence of ade­quate local capac­i­ty to assess and reg­u­late them effec­tive­ly.

While gene dri­ve lob­by­ists use the pos­si­bil­i­ty of malar­ia erad­i­ca­tion to pro­mote the tech­nol­o­gy, civ­il soci­ety organ­i­sa­tions have found that most patents are being filed for agri­cul­tur­al use. Patents ref­er­ence hun­dreds of agri­cul­tur­al uses, such as for her­bi­cides, pes­ti­cides and so called “pests”. Researchers found that agribusi­ness firms such as Mon­san­to-Bay­er and Cibus Bio­science were also engag­ing with gene dri­ve devel­op­ment.

At this year’s SBSTTA meet­ing, Par­ties are exam­in­ing reports from expert groups high­light­ing numer­ous risks and unan­swered ques­tions about gene dri­ves. Dis­cus­sions are par­tic­u­lar­ly focused on the con­trast­ing poten­tial ben­e­fits and risks these tech­nolo­gies might pose. Sub-Saha­ran coun­tries are advo­cat­ing for enhanced capac­i­ty build­ing, tech­nol­o­gy trans­fer, and some seem to be will­ing to adopt gene dri­ves. African civ­il soci­ety orga­ni­za­tions (CSOs) are call­ing for ongo­ing eval­u­a­tions and a robust, updat­ed reg­u­la­to­ry frame­work to man­age these tech­nolo­gies. They endorse a pre­cau­tion­ary approach and sup­port the estab­lish­ment of an inter­na­tion­al expert group to review new tech­nolo­gies before they are intro­duced to the envi­ron­ment. Deci­sions made at SBSTTA will be tak­en to the Con­fer­ence of the Par­ties to the CBD in Octo­ber 2024 to be fur­ther dis­cussed, where heads of states will decide on how to pro­ceed with these tech­nolo­gies.

Con­tacts:

Sab­ri­na Mas­in­ji­la, African Cen­tre for Bio­di­ver­si­ty, +255 767 089 834

Bar­bara Ntam­bir­we­ki. ETC Group Ugan­da.

Nao­mi Kos­mehl, Save Our Seeds,

to top