fact sheet Monsanto maize Mon 863

Mon 863 is a Bt maize developed by Monsanto to kill the corn rootworm, which attacks the roots of maize plants. It has been approved in the USA in 2002 and was planted there with mixed success for the first time on commercial scale in 2004. The corn rootworm has been inadvertedly imported from the USA to Europe ten years ago and is expanding since in some areas.
During the risk assessment of Mon 863 serious scientific questions on the maize safety for humans and animals arose, as rat feeding studies showed significant health impacts. The concerns have been dismissed by the European Food Safety Authorities Scientific Committee. Approval of Mon 863 for human consumption and animal feed has been granted in January 2006 against a majority of member states votes in the Council of ministers (June 2005) by the European Commission in January 2006. No application has been submitted so far for cultivation.

Greenpeace Press Release and background documentation, 13. March 2007: New study reveals signs of toxicity of GE maize approved for human consumption

European Commission Decision 2006/68/EC of 13 January 2006 authorising the placing on the market of foods and food ingredients derived from genetically modified maize line MON 863

Council of Environment Ministers vote on Commission proposal for approval of Mon863, 24 June 2005, In favour: 121, against: 142, abstentions: :58

European Commission: Proposal for a Council decision regarding the placing on the market of Mon 863 26. April 2005

Preliminary report by CRIIGEN on the “first public investgation of the crude data In Mon 863 toxicity test on rats”
        D. Cellier and G.E. Seralini, October 2005

Greenpeace PR: Court orders Monsanto to make scandal report public 11. June 2005
       Summary of the rat study
       13-Week Dietary Subchronic Comparison Study with MON 863 Corn in Rats Preseded by a 1-Week Baseline Food Consumption Determination with PMI Certified Rodent Diet #5002
       Full study (1100 pages!)
Prof. Arpad Pusztai: Interim report and preliminary evaluation of the summary report on the MON 863 study in rats October 2004

Details on MON863 hybrids MON863xMON810, MON863xNK603 and MON863xMON810xNK603, and on EFSA's opinion about them
      A dossier by Antje Lorch at IFRIK

GENET: EU demands Monsanto's test results on controversial corn 23. May 2005

Independent on Sunday: Revealed: health fears over secret study into GM food 22. May 2005

Monsanto: Backgrounder on MON 863 YieldGard® Rootworm Maize 22 May 2005

EFSA opinion on new GM maize: MON 863 maize considered as safe as conventional maize 20. April 2005

Reuters: EU Experts Fail To Authorise New Biotech Maize, 30.November 2004
Results of the Vote in the Standing Committee on GMOs, 29. November 2004

EFSA: Statement of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms, 20.October 2004
on an evaluation of the 13-week rat feeding study on MON 863

Vote in Standing Committee postponed as member states reject Mon 863, News, September 20, 2004

SUMMARY NOTIFICATION INFORMATION FORMAT (SNIF) MON 810 x Mon 863

Assessment report of the Robert Koch Institute (Germany) April 2003

EFSA: Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on Mon 863 x Mon 810 (April 2004)
EFSA assessed GM maize MON863 as harmless
On 19th of April 2004, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) published the opinion of the GMO Panel on Monsanto’s GM maize MON863. The GMO Panel rated the GM maize as harmless, although in the feeding experiments on rats noticeable aberration appeared. Rats fed with MON863 GM maize over 90 days showed altered blood levels, namely a slight increase in the white globules. The EFSA
judged this alteration as biologically not significant because the alterations were in the range of the standard deviation of the control group. With reference to the great standard deviations, the EFSA also rated the significantly lower weight and histological alterations in the group fed with GM maize as insignificant.

Greenpeace: Technical comments on Mon 863 (scientific assessment of safety), May 2004
detailed scientific assessment of the information avaiable on Mon 863.

GENET: Le Monde (France) discloses critical results of GE maizefeeding studies April 2004
Le Monde: L'expertise confidentielle sur un inquiétant maïs transgénique April 2004
Massive concerns of the French Food Safety authority on Mon 863 are revealed by Herve Kempf in Le Monde.

Evaluation of the safety studies on Mon 863 by Prof. Arpad Pusztai September 2004

Cropchoice: Some farmers question Yield Guard's quality (September 2004)

New Zealand:

Scoop: GE corn that caused rat abnormalities approved September 2004

USA:

Agbios Database Description
"Maize line MON 863 was produced using recombinant-DNA techniques to express the cry3Bb1 gene encoding a Coleopteran-specific insecticidal protein from Bacillus thuringiensis (subsp. kumamotoensis) in order to control infestation with corn root worm. This gene was introduced into the publicly available inbred line, A634, by particle acceleration (biolistic) transformation.
The cry3Bb1 gene encodes the insect control protein Cry3Bb1, a delta-endotoxin. Cry proteins, of which Cry3Bb1 is only one, act by selectively binding to specific sites localized on the lining of the midgut of susceptible insect species. Following binding, pores are formed that disrupt midgut ion flow, causing gut paralysis and eventual death due to bacterial sepsis. Cry3Bb1 is lethal only when eaten by Coleopteran species, including corn root worm, and its specificity of action is directly attributable to the presence of specific binding sites in the target insects. There are no binding sites for the delta-endotoxins of B. thuringiensis on the surface of mammalian intestinal cells, therefore, livestock animals and humans are not susceptible to these proteins. more

US APHIS approval (2002)

US Food and Drug Administration detailed description of Mon 863

        Union of Concerned Scientists Comments (2002)

         Centre for Food Safety Comments (2002)

Health Canada decision document Mon 863

Detection methods review by the EU Joint Research Centre